Comments on: Blogging by Candlelight http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/?&owa_from=feed&owa_sid= Gavin Clabaugh's irregular blog on irregular things. Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:44:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Pages tagged "morphine" http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2475 Pages tagged "morphine" Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:27:29 +0000 http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2475 [...] bookmarks tagged morphine Blogging by Candlelight saved by 17 others     JudithOne bookmarked on 02/01/08 | [...] [...] bookmarks tagged morphine Blogging by Candlelight saved by 17 others     JudithOne bookmarked on 02/01/08 | [...]

]]> By: Gavin Clabaugh http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2467 Gavin Clabaugh Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:11:59 +0000 http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2467 Hi Steve, 'twas nice to see your name pop up. So far, call-em-all has been great. But, as with most disaster recovery systems, it's really tough to test. The proof is in the pudding, as they say. (They also say that "fine words butter no parsnips.) The real test will be when the building crumbles around me. I don't particularly want to hurry that. As a result, we've only had "opportunity" to test the system using a limited number of telephonically abused IT staff. It has been flawless in testing. The technology is invisible (as it should be). Other than that, I can't vouch for the company, their survivability, or the like. Gavin Hi Steve,

’twas nice to see your name pop up. So far, call-em-all has been great. But, as with most disaster recovery systems, it’s really tough to test. The proof is in the pudding, as they say. (They also say that “fine words butter no parsnips.)

The real test will be when the building crumbles around me. I don’t particularly want to hurry that.

As a result, we’ve only had “opportunity” to test the system using a limited number of telephonically abused IT staff. It has been flawless in testing. The technology is invisible (as it should be). Other than that, I can’t vouch for the company, their survivability, or the like.

Gavin

]]> By: Steve Albertson http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2466 Steve Albertson Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:16:26 +0000 http://www.digitaldiner.org/2008/01/30/blogging-by-candlelight/#comment-2466 Hi Gavin. Great post, as always. I'm glad to learn about Call-em-All. We provide voice mail to over 40,000 homeless and "phoneless" people around the country, and the ability to send out broadcast voice messages is proving to be one of the most valuable components of our service. We may start working with a partner who can provide us with lots of voice mail boxes, but can't provide this service natively within their voice mail app (yet). Call-em-All might be a good interim option for this. How do you like their technology? Do they seem like a good company that might be around for a while? Does it work well? We may ultimately use them to send messages to a thousand boxes at a time... Steve Community Voice Mail Hi Gavin. Great post, as always. I’m glad to learn about Call-em-All. We provide voice mail to over 40,000 homeless and “phoneless” people around the country, and the ability to send out broadcast voice messages is proving to be one of the most valuable components of our service. We may start working with a partner who can provide us with lots of voice mail boxes, but can’t provide this service natively within their voice mail app (yet). Call-em-All might be a good interim option for this. How do you like their technology? Do they seem like a good company that might be around for a while? Does it work well? We may ultimately use them to send messages to a thousand boxes at a time…

Steve
Community Voice Mail

]]>